Dear
Michael,
I
admire the quality of your questions, and thank you for the understanding that
you show me. I am going through one of the most difficult periods of my life
and, consequently, am unable to respond as I would like. I haven’t the time.
These killings
in Paris – with 20 dead in all, amongst whom five
Jews – rightly arouse widespread indignation but the Jewish organisations have
immediately exploited this indignation for their benefit. They forget that, in
large part, it’s been under the pressure of international and French Jewish
organisations that France has hastily engaged in all sorts of military
expeditions causing so many deaths in the Arab-Muslim world. They forget this
country’s responsibility in the creation of the bogus State of Israel – soon afterwards
arming it with nuclear weapons – and in the appalling fate of the Palestinian
people since at least 1948; the presence of Netanyahu in Paris and his doings
there were, in themselves, an affront to an entire part of the Arab-Muslim
world. Those Jewish organisations live
in anger and war; that being the case, how can they be surprised if their adversaries
live in anger and war as well?
Such
killings may bring to mind a number of murders committed by Jews who subsequently
became “heroes” of Jewish history. On February 25, 1994 Baruch Goldstein, an
Israeli army physician armed with an assault rifle, shot dead 24 Muslim
worshipers and wounded 125 at the Cave of the Patriarchs in Hebron before being
subdued and killed there himself. His nearby
tomb is a pilgrimage site for many Jews.
The
hysteria we are witnessing now in France, in this month of January 2015, has a precedent:
that of May 1990 and the “Carpentras cemetery” affair. It was the exploitation
of that event that made it possible to intimidate the French parliament into passing
what is called “the Fabius-Gayssot Act” of July 13, 1990, punishing by a term
of imprisonment of from one month to one year and a fine of up to 300,000
francs (now 45,000 euros), along with several other sanctions, those who dispute
“the existence of crimes against humanity” (that is, essentially, crimes
against Jews) as defined and punished in 1945-1946 by a body that the winners
of the recent war had dared to name “International Military Tribunal” (three
lies in three words) of Nuremberg. This law, totally
contrary to the French constitution, came into effect by appearing in the Journal Officiel de la République Française
of July 14, 1990, anniversary of the storming of the Bastille. It was thanks to
a televised lie of the Socialist president of parliament, Jewish millionaire Laurent
Fabius (his announcement to viewers that the corpse of a Jew in the Carpentras
cemetery had been taken out of a grave and impaled through the rectum with a
parasol pole), that the French had been outraged. The Catholic authorities rang
the great bell of Notre-Dame in Paris. The President, Socialist François
Mitterrand, led a march through the centre of the capital at the head of crowds
of demonstrators. We have now, in 2015, seen the same scenario repeated in the
same place, with Fabius in the front rank of “protesting” dignitaries, the
Archbishop taking the initiative of ringing the cathedral’s bells, the
Socialist President François Hollande marching through the streets.
Moreover,
those Jewish organisations affect an attitude of desiring to come to the aid of
freedom of opinion and expression but, in reality, what they are demanding is
increased repression against “Holocaust denial”. Revisionism has made
significant progress in recent years here in France, thanks especially to the
Internet. Those groups therefore want censorship of the Internet, of Dieudonné (who
has perhaps more than 80 legal proceedings pending against him), of the
revisionists and of a number of other unbowed men and women.
For
want of time, I shall allow myself just three remarks to finish: 1) the name Charlie-Hebdo has, apparently, nothing to do with
Charles de Gaulle; it comes, I believe, from the Peanuts character Charlie
Brown; 2) Gayssot is the surname of a former Communist MP and government
minister, and the Fabius-Gayssot Act is sometimes called the “Faurisson Law” or
“Lex Faurissoniana”; I have lost count of the times I’ve been ordered to pay
fines or damages on the grounds of this law; other revisionists have been
thrown into prison or, like Vincent Reynouard, a father of nine, will be returning
to prison; for my part, I’ve settled for ten physical assaults – of which eight
in France – and the actions of the French police, who have carried out numerous
searches and seizures, or attempted seizures, at my house, and who have often
REFUSED to protect me in the presence of danger; 3) I hope to be able, before
long, to send you an English version of my nine-page article (with
illustrations) of December 31, 2014 entitled:
In 70 years, no forensic study proving the existence
and operation of the “Nazi gas chambers”!
I thank
you, dear Michael, and congratulate you on the work you have done over so many
years, and in such difficult conditions, for the just cause of historical
revisionism.
Robert
Faurisson, January 13, 2015